Tecnología, cuerpo y discapacidad: la corpoespacialidad y sus objetos cotidianos

Joan Francisco Matamoros Sanin

doi:10.29105/diversia.v1i2.12

Authors

Joan Francisco Matamoros Sanin Centro de Investigación y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4615-362X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/diversia.v1i2.12

Keywords:

disability, corpospatiality, technology, body, disability studies

Abstract

This text represents a theoretical model for understanding disability, emphasizing the relational dynamics between the body, space and everyday objects. Drawing on different traditions, it argues that disability is not solely a biomedical condition but a sociocultural and spatial phenomenon that emerges through the interaction between individuals, their environments, and the material objects that mediate in everyday life. The discussion examines how technologies and artifacts such as wheelchairs, canes, prostheses, and other mundane objects facilitate mobility and contribute to the construction of meaning, identity and social participation. Building on the notion of “techniques of the body through space”, the bodily practices configured through cultural contexts and spatial relations are explored. It also engages with disability studies and cyborg theory to question conventional boundaries between bodies and technologies, highlighting forms of intimacy, embodiment and mutual constitution. The writing concludes that technologies associated with disability should be understood not merely as devices but as assemblages of practices, knowledge, meanings and power relations embedded in specific historical and sociocultural contexts.
This perspective offers a relational framework for analyzing disability in relationship to space and social life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Babyar, J. (2019). In search of Pan-American indigenous health and harmony. Globalization and Health, 15(16). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0454-1

Balslev, H., & Gutiérrez Martínez, D. (Coords.). (2008). Revisitar la etnicidad: Miradas cruzadas en torno a la diversidad. El Colegio de Sonora, El Colegio Mexiquense & Siglo XXI Editores.

Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Polity Press.

Coronado, G. (2005). Competing health models in Mexico: An ideological dialogue between Indian and hegemonic views. Anthropology & Medicine, 12(2), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470500140047

Dokumaci, A. (2017). Vital affordances, occupying niches: An ecological approach to disability and performance. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 22(3), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2017.1326808

Duch, L., & Mèlich, J. C. (2005). Escenarios de la corporeidad: Antropología de la vida cotidiana 2/1. Editorial Trotta.

Gómez Guillén, F. A. (2018). Masculinidades indígenas: Una autopsia a los hombres zinacantecos. Tesis de maestría. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social [CIESAS]. https://ciesas.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/handle/1015/891

Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.

Haraway, D. J. (2016). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. En Manifestly Haraway (pp. 5-80). University of Minnesota Press.

Herzfeld, M. (1985). The poetics of manhood: Contest and identity in a Cretan mountain village. Princeton University Press.

Lemonnier, P. (2012). Mundane objects: Materiality and non-verbal communication. Left Coast Press.

López Moya, M. C. (2018). Hacerse hombres cabales: Masculinidades entre tojolabales (2ª ed.). Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas; Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social.

Matamoros-Sanin, J. F., & Montesi, L. (2025). Indigenous men with disabilities at work: Corpospatial reconfigurations in/of a changing rural Mexico. Anthropology of Work Review, 46, e70003. https://doi.org/10.1111/awr.70003

Matamoros-Sanin, J. F. (2023, mayo). Entre la antropología del bienestar y la evocación sensorial: Reflexiones en torno a la discapacidad como conflicto corpoespacial. Ichan Tecolotl, 34(372). https://ichan.ciesas.edu.mx/entre-la-antropologia-del-bienestar-y-la-evocacion-sensorial-reflexiones-en-torno-a-la-discapacidad-como-conflicto-corpoespacial/

Matamoros-Sanin, J. F., & Peláez-Ballestas, I. (2016). Spatial notions and illness. En J. Davidson & Y. Saber (Eds.), Narrating illness: Prospects and constraints (pp. 35–45). Interdisciplinary Press.

Mauss, M. (1973). Techniques of the body. Economy and Society, 2(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147300000003

Peláez-Ballestas, I., Pérez-Taylor, R., Aceves-Ávila, J. F., & Burgos-Vargas, R. (2013). ‘Not-belonging’: Illness narratives of Mexican patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Medical Anthropology, 32(5), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2012.716883

Reeve, D. (2012). Cyborgs, cripples and iCrips: Reflections on the contribution of Haraway to disability studies. En D. Goodley, B. Hughes, & L. J. Davis (Eds.), Disability and social theory: New developments and directions (pp. 91–112). Palgrave Macmillan.

Roldán, J., Álvarez, M., Carrasco, M., Guarneros, N., Ledesma, J., Cuchillo-Hilario, M., & Chávez, A. (2017). Marginalization and health service coverage among indigenous, rural and urban populations: A health problem in Mexico. Rural and Remote Health, 17, 3948. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH3948

Salcedo Barragán, M., & Ortiz Ocaña, A. L. (2017). Análisis epistémico del pensamiento configuracional. Zona Próxima, 26, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.14482/zp.26.10180

Santos, M. (2009). La naturaleza del espacio. Ariel.